Differences

Top features of Intel Atom C3750
-
More number of cores8
2
2 times more threads -
Performance per watt21 W
51 W
About 2.43 0.97 times less performance per watt

Top features of Intel Celeron G3900
-
Higher clock speed2.80 GHz
2.20 GHz
Around 21% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of Intel Atom C3750 and Intel Celeron G3900 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Name |
Intel Atom C3750
![]() |
Segment |
Desktop / Server
![]() |
Family |
Intel Atom
![]() |
Generation |
2
![]() |
CPU group |
Intel Atom C3000
![]() |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare Intel Atom C3750 vs Intel Celeron G3900 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Frequency |
2.20 GHz
![]() |
CPU Cores |
8
![]() |
Turbo (1 Core) |
2.40 GHz
![]() |
CPU Threads |
8
![]() |
Hyperthreading |
No
![]() |
Overclocking |
No
![]() |
Core architecture |
normal
![]() |
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Atom C3750 and Intel Celeron G3900 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
GPU name |
no iGPU
![]() |
GPU frequency |
![]() |
GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
![]() |
Execution units |
![]() |
Shader |
![]() |
Max. GPU Memory |
--
![]() |
Max. displays |
![]() |
Generation |
![]() |
DirectX Version |
![]() |
Technology |
![]() |
Release date |
![]() |
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Atom C3750 and Intel Celeron G3900. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
![]() |
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
![]() |
h264 |
No
![]() |
VP9 |
No
![]() |
VP8 |
No
![]() |
AV1 |
No
![]() |
AVC |
No
![]() |
VC-1 |
No
![]() |
JPEG |
No
![]() |
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between Intel Atom C3750 and Intel Celeron G3900 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Memory type |
DDR4-2133
![]() |
Max. Memory |
256 GB
![]() |
ECC |
Yes
![]() |
Memory channels |
2
![]() |
PCIe version |
3.0
![]() |
PCIe lanes |
12
![]() |
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Atom C3750 and Intel Celeron G3900.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
AES-NI |
Yes
![]() |
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Atom C3750 or Intel Celeron G3900? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
TDP (PL1) |
21 W
![]() |
Tjunction max. |
100 °C
![]() |
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Atom C3750 and Intel Celeron G3900 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
![]() |
Virtualization |
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
![]() |
ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
![]() |
L2-Cache |
16.00 MB
![]() |
L3-Cache |
--
![]() |
Architecture |
Denverton
![]() |
Technology |
14 nm
![]() |
Socket |
BGA 1310
![]() |
Release date |
Q3/2017
![]() |
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on Intel Atom C3750 and Intel Celeron G3900.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Used in |
Unknown
![]() |