HiSilicon Kirin 659
Samsung Exynos 7580
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Samsung Exynos 7580

Comparison of video cards HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Samsung Exynos 7580 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

HiSilicon Kirin 659

Top features of HiSilicon Kirin 659

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
    Around -6% better clock speed
Samsung Exynos 7580

Top features of Samsung Exynos 7580

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of HiSilicon Kirin 659 and Samsung Exynos 7580 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name HiSilicon Kirin 659 left arrow Samsung Exynos 7580
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Samsung Exynos
Generation 4 left arrow 1
CPU group HiSilicon Kirin 650 left arrow Samsung Exynos 7578/7580

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Samsung Exynos 7580 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 1.70 GHz left arrow 1.60 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in HiSilicon Kirin 659 and Samsung Exynos 7580 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name ARM Mali-T830 MP2 left arrow ARM Mali-T720 MP2
GPU frequency 0.90 GHz left arrow 0.65 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.90 GHz left arrow 0.65 GHz
Execution units 2 left arrow 2
Shader 32 left arrow 32
Max. displays 2 left arrow 2
Generation Midgard 4 left arrow Midgard 3
Technology 28nm left arrow 28nm
Release date Q4/2015 left arrow Q4/2013

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between HiSilicon Kirin 659 and Samsung Exynos 7580. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) Decode / Encode left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) Decode left arrow No
h264 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow No
VC-1 No left arrow No
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between HiSilicon Kirin 659 and Samsung Exynos 7580 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type LPDDR3-933 left arrow LPDDR3-933
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 2 left arrow 0

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for HiSilicon Kirin 659 or Samsung Exynos 7580? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for HiSilicon Kirin 659 and Samsung Exynos 7580 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
Virtualization None left arrow None
L2-Cache -- left arrow 2.00 MB
Architecture Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A53
Technology 16 nm left arrow 28 nm
Socket N/A left arrow N/A
Release date Q2/2016 left arrow Q2/2015

Benchmarks

Real tests HiSilicon Kirin 659 vs Samsung Exynos 7580

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)

Geekbench 5 benchmark is the newest software suit.

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)

Geekbench 5 software suite shows benchmark testing results of the memory performance and speed of the multi-core processor.

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons