Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD Opteron X3418
-
Higher clock speed2.80 GHz
1.60 GHz
Around -75% better clock speed -
Performance per watt15 W
32 W
About 2.13 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Atom C5310
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD Opteron X3418 and Intel Atom C5310 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD Opteron X3418
Intel Atom C5310
|
| Family |
AMD Opteron
Intel Atom
|
| CPU group |
AMD Opteron X3000
Intel Atom C5000
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
0
6
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD Opteron X3418 vs Intel Atom C5310 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| CPU Cores / Threads |
4 / 4
4 / 4
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Cores |
4x
4x
|
| Hyperthreading / SMT |
No
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
2.80 GHz
1.60 GHz
|
| Turbo Frequency (1 Core) |
3.20 GHz
--
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD Opteron X3418 and Intel Atom C5310 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Toronto)
no iGPU
|
| GPU frequency |
0.80 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
6
|
| Shader |
384
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Direct X |
0
--
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD Opteron X3418 and Intel Atom C5310. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
Decode
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
Decode / Encode
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
Decode
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD Opteron X3418 and Intel Atom C5310 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
256 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2 (Dual Channel)
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| PCIe |
3 x 8
3.0 x 12
|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD Opteron X3418 or Intel Atom C5310? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
15 W
32 W
|
| TDP up |
35 W
--
|
| TDP down |
12 W
--
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
100 \xc2\xb0C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD Opteron X3418 and Intel Atom C5310 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
10 nm
|
| Chip design |
Monolithic
|
| Socket |
FP4
BGA 2106
|
| L2-Cache |
2.00 MB
9.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Toronto (Excavator)
Parker Ridge
|
| Operating systems |
Windows 10, Linux
Windows 10, Linux
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V, AMD-Vt
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, Intel QAT
|
| Release date |
Q2/2015
Q2/2022
|
| Part Number |
OX3418AAY43KA
--
|
| Documents |
--
Technical data sheet
|
