Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD Opteron 3280
-
More number of cores8
4
2 times more threads -
Performance per watt65 W
125 W
About 1.92 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of AMD FX-4170
-
Higher clock speed4.20 GHz
2.40 GHz
Around 43% better clock speed
-
Higher turbo clock speed4.40 GHz
3.50 GHz
Around 20 % better overclocked clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD FX-4170 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD Opteron 3280
AMD FX-4170
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Family |
AMD Opteron
AMD FX
|
| Generation |
1
1
|
| CPU group |
AMD Opteron 3000
AMD FX-4100/4200
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD Opteron 3280 vs AMD FX-4170 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
2.40 GHz
4.20 GHz
|
| CPU Cores |
8
4
|
| Turbo (1 Core) |
3.50 GHz
4.40 GHz
|
| CPU Threads |
8
4
|
| Hyperthreading |
No
No
|
| Overclocking |
No
Yes
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD FX-4170 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
no iGPU
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD FX-4170. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
No
|
| VC-1 |
No
No
|
| JPEG |
No
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD FX-4170 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1866
|
| ECC |
Yes
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
2
2
|
| PCIe version |
2.0
|
| PCIe lanes |
16
|
Encryption
AES-NI encryption support for CPUs AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD FX-4170.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| AES-NI |
Yes
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD Opteron 3280 or AMD FX-4170? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
65 W
125 W
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD FX-4170 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V
AMD-V
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
|
| L3-Cache |
8.00 MB
8.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Zurich (Bulldozer)
Zambezi (Bulldozer)
|
| Technology |
32 nm
32 nm
|
| Socket |
AM3+
AM3+
|
| Release date |
Q1/2012
Q1/2012
|
Devices using this processor
List of devices based on AMD Opteron 3280 and AMD FX-4170.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Used in |
Unknown
Unknown
|
