AMD G-T30L
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD G-T30L vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Comparison of video cards AMD G-T30L vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

AMD G-T30L

Top features of AMD G-T30L

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    18 W left arrow 35 W
    About 1.94 0.97 times less performance per watt
AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Top features of AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.30 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
    Around 58% better clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD G-T30L and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name AMD G-T30L left arrow AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family AMD G left arrow AMD Ryzen 9
Generation 1 left arrow 5
CPU group AMD G left arrow AMD Ryzen 6000H

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD G-T30L vs AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 1.40 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD G-T30L and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon RX 680M
GPU frequency left arrow 2.00 GHz
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow 2.40 GHz
Execution units left arrow 12
Shader left arrow 768
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 8 GB
Max. displays left arrow 3
Generation left arrow 9
Technology left arrow 6 nm
Release date left arrow Q1/2022

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD G-T30L and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow Decode
AVC No left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 No left arrow Decode
JPEG No left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD G-T30L and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3-1066 left arrow DDR5-4800, LPDDR5-6400
Max. Memory left arrow 64 GB
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 1 left arrow 4 (Quad Channel)

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD G-T30L or AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 18 W left arrow 35 W
Tjunction max. -- left arrow 95 \xc2\xb0C

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD G-T30L and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 6950HS CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization AMD-V left arrow AMD-V, SVM
ISA extensions SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache -- left arrow 4.00 MB
L3-Cache 1.00 MB left arrow 16.00 MB
Architecture Ontario (Bobcat) left arrow Rembrandt (Zen 3+)
Technology 40 nm left arrow 6 nm
Socket N/A left arrow FP7
Release date Q1/2011 left arrow Q2/2022

Latest comparisons