Intel Celeron N4000 VS AMD FX-9830P

Comparison of video cards Intel Celeron N4000 vs AMD FX-9830P in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences Specifications Benchmarks

Differences

Top features of AMD FX-9830P

Report a bug

Higher clock speed

3.00 GHz 1.10 GHz

Around -173% better clock speed

Top features of Intel Celeron N4000

Report a bug

Performance per watt

6 W 35 W

About 0.17 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

AMD FX-9830P Intel Celeron N4000

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD FX-9830P and Intel Celeron N4000 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification	Value
Name	AMD FX-9830P Intel Celeron N4000
Family	AMD FX Intel Celeron
CPU group	AMD FX-9800 Intel Celeron J4000/N4000/N5000
Segment	Mobile Mobile
Generation	4 9

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD FX-9830P vs Intel Celeron N4000 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification	Value
Core architecture	normal normal
Overclocking	No No
Frequency	3.00 GHz 1.10 GHz

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD FX-9830P and Intel Celeron N4000 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification	Value
GPU name	AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge) Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU frequency	0.90 GHz 0.20 GHz
GPU (Turbo)	No turbo 0.65 GHz
Execution units	8 12
Shader	512 96
Max. GPU Memory	2 GB 8 GB
Max. displays	2 3
Generation	6 9.5
Technology	28 nm 14 nm
Release date	Q2/2016 Q4/2017

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Celeron N4000. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification	Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No Decode / Encode
h264	Decode Decode / Encode
VP8	No Decode / Encode
VP9	No Decode / Encode
AV1	No No
AVC	Decode Decode / Encode
VC-1	Decode Decode
JPEG	Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD FX-9830P and Intel Celeron N4000 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification	Value
Memory type	DDR4-2400 DDR4-2400
Max. Memory	64 GB 8 GB
Memory channels	2 (Dual Channel) 2
ECC	No No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD FX-9830P or Intel Celeron N4000? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification	Value
TDP (PL1)	35 W 6 W
TDP up	45 W --
TDP down	25 W --
Tjunction max.	90 \xc2\xb0C --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD FX-9830P and Intel Celeron N4000 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification	Value
Technology	28 nm 10 nm
Socket	FP4 BGA 1090
L2-Cache	2.00 MB --
L3-Cache	-- 4.00 MB
Architecture	Excavator (Bristol Ridge) Gemini Lake
Virtualization	AMD-V VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit) x86-64 (64 bit)
ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4 SSE4.1, SSE4.2
Release date	Q2/2016 Q4/2017