Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD Epyc 7F52
-
Higher clock speed3.50 GHz
2.00 GHz
Around -75% better clock speed
Top features of Intel Celeron N5095A
-
Performance per watt15 W
240 W
About 0.06 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD Epyc 7F52 and Intel Celeron N5095A is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD Epyc 7F52
Intel Celeron N5095A
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Mobile
|
| Family |
AMD Epyc
Intel Celeron
|
| Generation |
2
10
|
| CPU group |
AMD Epyc 7002
Intel Celeron N4000/N5000
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD Epyc 7F52 vs Intel Celeron N5095A by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Frequency |
3.50 GHz
2.00 GHz
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD Epyc 7F52 and Intel Celeron N5095A along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
no iGPU
Intel UHD Graphics 16 EUs (Jasper Lake)
|
| GPU frequency |
0.35 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
0.75 GHz
|
| Execution units |
16
|
| Shader |
128
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
--
8 GB
|
| Max. displays |
3
|
| Generation |
11
|
| Technology |
10 nm
|
| Release date |
Q1/2021
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD Epyc 7F52 and Intel Celeron N5095A. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h264 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
No
Decode
|
| JPEG |
No
Decode / Encode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD Epyc 7F52 and Intel Celeron N5095A you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-3200
DDR4-2933, LPDDR4-2933
|
| Max. Memory |
16 GB
|
| ECC |
Yes
No
|
| Memory channels |
8
2 (Dual Channel)
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD Epyc 7F52 or Intel Celeron N5095A? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
240 W
15 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
105 \xc2\xb0C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD Epyc 7F52 and Intel Celeron N5095A CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V, SVM
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| L2-Cache |
--
1.50 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
256.00 MB
4.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Rome (Zen 2)
Jasper Lake
|
| Technology |
7 nm
10 nm
|
| Socket |
SP3
BGA 1338
|
| Release date |
Q2/2020
Q3/2021
|
