Differences

Top features of AMD EPYC 7373X
-
Performance per watt240 W
280 W
About 1.17 0.97 times less performance per watt

Top features of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX
-
Higher clock speed3.60 GHz
3.05 GHz
Around 15% better clock speed
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Name |
AMD EPYC 7373X
![]() |
Family |
AMD EPYC
![]() |
CPU group |
AMD EPYC 7003
![]() |
Segment |
Desktop / Server
![]() |
Generation |
3
![]() |
Predecessor |
--
![]() |
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD EPYC 7373X vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
CPU Cores / Threads |
16 / 32
![]() |
Core architecture |
normal
![]() |
Cores |
16x Zen 3
![]() |
Hyperthreading / SMT |
Yes
![]() |
Overclocking |
No
![]() |
Frequency |
3.05 GHz
![]() |
Turbo Frequency (1 Core) |
3.80 GHz
![]() |
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
GPU name |
no iGPU
![]() |
GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
![]() |
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
![]() |
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
![]() |
h264 |
No
![]() |
VP8 |
No
![]() |
VP9 |
No
![]() |
AV1 |
No
![]() |
AVC |
No
![]() |
VC-1 |
No
![]() |
JPEG |
No
![]() |
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Memory type |
DDR4-3200
![]() |
Max. Memory |
4096 GB
![]() |
Memory channels |
8 (Octa Channel)
![]() |
Bandwidth |
204.8 GB/s
![]() |
ECC |
Yes
![]() |
PCIe |
4.0 x 128
![]() |
AES-NI |
Yes
![]() |
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD EPYC 7373X or AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
TDP (PL1) |
240 W
![]() |
TDP up |
280 W
![]() |
TDP down |
225 W
![]() |
Tjunction max. |
--
![]() |
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD EPYC 7373X and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
Specification | Value |
---|---|
Technology |
7 nm
![]() |
Chip design |
Chiplet
![]() |
Socket |
SP3
![]() |
L2-Cache |
32.00 MB
![]() |
L3-Cache |
768.00 MB
![]() |
Architecture |
Milan (Zen 3)
![]() |
Operating systems |
Windows 10, Linux
![]() |
Virtualization |
AMD-V, SVM
![]() |
Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
![]() |
ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
![]() |
Release date |
Q2/2022
![]() |
Release price |
3900 $
![]() |
Documents |
--
![]() |