AMD Epyc 7251
AMD Athlon 300GE
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD Epyc 7251 vs AMD Athlon 300GE

Comparison of video cards AMD Epyc 7251 vs AMD Athlon 300GE in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

AMD Epyc 7251

Top features of AMD Epyc 7251

Report a bug
AMD Athlon 300GE

Top features of AMD Athlon 300GE

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
    Around 38% better clock speed
  • Performance per watt
    35 W left arrow 120 W
    About 0.29 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD Epyc 7251 and AMD Athlon 300GE is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name AMD Epyc 7251 left arrow AMD Athlon 300GE
Segment Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
Family AMD Epyc left arrow AMD Athlon
Generation 1 left arrow 4
CPU group AMD Epyc 7001 left arrow AMD Athlon 300

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD Epyc 7251 vs AMD Athlon 300GE by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 2.10 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow Yes
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD Epyc 7251 and AMD Athlon 300GE along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
GPU frequency left arrow 1.10 GHz
GPU (Turbo) No turbo left arrow No turbo
Execution units left arrow 3
Shader left arrow 192
Max. GPU Memory -- left arrow 2 GB
Max. displays left arrow 3
Generation left arrow 8
Technology left arrow 14 nm
Release date left arrow Q1/2018

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD Epyc 7251 and AMD Athlon 300GE. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow Decode / Encode
h264 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP9 No left arrow Decode / Encode
VP8 No left arrow Decode / Encode
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC No left arrow Decode / Encode
VC-1 No left arrow Decode
JPEG No left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD Epyc 7251 and AMD Athlon 300GE you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
Max. Memory left arrow 64 GB
ECC Yes left arrow Yes
Memory channels 8 left arrow 2 (Dual Channel)

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD Epyc 7251 or AMD Athlon 300GE? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 120 W left arrow 35 W
Tjunction max. -- left arrow 95 \xc2\xb0C

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD Epyc 7251 and AMD Athlon 300GE CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization AMD-V, SVM left arrow AMD-V, SVM
ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
L2-Cache -- left arrow 1.00 MB
L3-Cache 32.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
Architecture Naples (Zen) left arrow Dali (Zen)
Technology 14 nm left arrow 14 nm
Socket SP3 left arrow AM4 (LGA 1331)
Release date Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2019

Latest comparisons