AMD A8-7200P
AMD EPYC 9554P
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD A8-7200P vs AMD EPYC 9554P

Comparison of video cards AMD A8-7200P vs AMD EPYC 9554P in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

AMD A8-7200P

Top features of AMD A8-7200P

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    35 W left arrow 360 W
    About 10.29 0.97 times less performance per watt
AMD EPYC 9554P

Top features of AMD EPYC 9554P

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    3.10 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
    Around 23% better clock speed

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD A8-7200P and AMD EPYC 9554P is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name AMD A8-7200P left arrow AMD EPYC 9554P
Segment Mobile left arrow Desktop / Server
Family AMD A left arrow AMD EPYC
Generation 4 left arrow 4
CPU group AMD A8-7000 left arrow AMD EPYC 9004

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD A8-7200P vs AMD EPYC 9554P by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 2.40 GHz left arrow 3.10 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow No
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A8-7200P and AMD EPYC 9554P along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name AMD Radeon R5 (Kaveri) left arrow no iGPU
GPU frequency 0.55 GHz left arrow
GPU (Turbo) 0.63 GHz left arrow No turbo
Execution units 4 left arrow
Shader 256 left arrow
Max. GPU Memory 2 GB left arrow --
Max. displays 2 left arrow
Generation 6 left arrow
Technology 28 nm left arrow
Release date Q1/2014 left arrow

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A8-7200P and AMD EPYC 9554P. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode left arrow No
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC Decode left arrow No
VC-1 Decode left arrow No
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow No

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD A8-7200P and AMD EPYC 9554P you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR5-4800
Max. Memory left arrow 6144 GB
ECC Yes left arrow Yes
Memory channels 2 left arrow 12

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A8-7200P or AMD EPYC 9554P? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 35 W left arrow 360 W
TDP up -- left arrow 400 W
TDP down -- left arrow 320 W
Tjunction max. -- left arrow 100 \xc2\xb0C

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A8-7200P and AMD EPYC 9554P CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization AMD-V left arrow AMD-V, SVM
ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
L2-Cache -- left arrow 64.00 MB
L3-Cache 4.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
Architecture Kaveri (Steamroller) left arrow Genoa (Zen 4)
Technology 28 nm left arrow 5 nm
Socket FM2+ left arrow SP5
Release date Q2/2014 left arrow Q4/2022
Part Number -- left arrow 100-000000804

Latest comparisons