AMD A4-5145M
AMD E2-7015
Select graphics card
Select graphics card

Comparing AMD A4-5145M vs AMD E2-7015

Comparison of video cards AMD A4-5145M vs AMD E2-7015 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences

AMD A4-5145M

Top features of AMD A4-5145M

Report a bug
  • Higher clock speed
    2.00 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz
    Around -33% better clock speed
AMD E2-7015

Top features of AMD E2-7015

Report a bug
  • Performance per watt
    10 W left arrow 17 W
    About 0.59 times less performance per watt

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of AMD A4-5145M and AMD E2-7015 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification Value
Name AMD A4-5145M left arrow AMD E2-7015
Segment Mobile left arrow Mobile
Family AMD A left arrow AMD E
Generation 3 left arrow 0
CPU group AMD A4-5000M left arrow Unknown M

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare AMD A4-5145M vs AMD E2-7015 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification Value
Frequency 2.00 GHz left arrow 1.50 GHz
Overclocking No left arrow Yes
Core architecture normal left arrow normal

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A4-5145M and AMD E2-7015 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification Value
GPU name AMD Radeon HD 8310G left arrow AMD Radeon R2 (Beema)
GPU frequency 0.42 GHz left arrow 0.35 GHz
GPU (Turbo) 0.55 GHz left arrow No turbo
Execution units 2 left arrow 2
Shader 128 left arrow 128
Max. GPU Memory 2 GB left arrow 2 GB
Max. displays 2 left arrow 2
Generation 5 left arrow 6
Technology 32 nm left arrow 28 nm
Release date Q2/2013 left arrow Q1/2015

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A4-5145M and AMD E2-7015. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit) No left arrow No
h265 / HEVC (10 bit) No left arrow No
h264 Decode left arrow Decode
VP9 No left arrow No
VP8 No left arrow No
AV1 No left arrow No
AVC Decode left arrow Decode
VC-1 Decode left arrow Decode
JPEG Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between AMD A4-5145M and AMD E2-7015 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification Value
Memory type DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR3-1333
ECC No left arrow No
Memory channels 2 left arrow 1 (Single Channel)

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A4-5145M or AMD E2-7015? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification Value
TDP (PL1) 17 W left arrow 10 W

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A4-5145M and AMD E2-7015 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification Value
Instruction set (ISA) x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
Virtualization AMD-V left arrow Unknown
ISA extensions SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow Unknown
L2-Cache -- left arrow 1.00 MB
L3-Cache 1.00 MB left arrow --
Architecture Richland (Piledriver) left arrow Unknown
Technology 32 nm left arrow
Socket FP2 left arrow FP4
Release date Q2/2013 left arrow --

Benchmarks

Real tests AMD A4-5145M vs AMD E2-7015

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)

This test serves for determining the performance of integrated graphics in Intel and AMD processors.

Latest comparisons