Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD A4-5000
Top features of Apple A16 Bionic
-
Performance per watt8.5 W
15 W
About 0.57 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD A4-5000 and Apple A16 Bionic is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD A4-5000
Apple A16 Bionic
|
| Segment |
Mobile
Mobile
|
| Family |
AMD A
Apple A series
|
| Generation |
4
16
|
| CPU group |
AMD A4-5000
Apple A16
|
| Predecessor |
--
Apple A15 Bionic (5-GPU)
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD A4-5000 vs Apple A16 Bionic by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Overclocking |
Yes
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A4-5000 and Apple A16 Bionic along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
AMD Radeon HD 8330
Apple A16 (5 GPU Cores)
|
| GPU frequency |
0.50 GHz
0.70 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
2
160
|
| Shader |
128
1280
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
2 GB
8 GB
|
| Max. displays |
2
3
|
| Generation |
5
13
|
| Technology |
28 nm
4 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2013
Q3/2022
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A4-5000 and Apple A16 Bionic. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h264 |
Decode
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
Decode
Decode
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
Decode
|
| JPEG |
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD A4-5000 and Apple A16 Bionic you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
LPDDR5-6400
|
| Max. Memory |
6 GB
|
| ECC |
No
No
|
| Memory channels |
2
1 (Single Channel)
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A4-5000 or Apple A16 Bionic? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
15 W
8.5 W
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A4-5000 and Apple A16 Bionic CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V
None
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
|
| L2-Cache |
--
20.00 MB
|
| L3-Cache |
2.00 MB
24.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Kabini (Jaguar)
A16
|
| Technology |
28 nm
4 nm
|
| Socket |
N/A
N/A
|
| Release date |
Q3/2013
Q3/2022
|
