Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD A12-9800
-
Higher clock speed3.80 GHz
2.00 GHz
Around -90% better clock speed
Top features of Intel Atom C3858
-
Performance per watt25 W
65 W
About 0.38 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3858 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD A12-9800
Intel Atom C3858
|
| Family |
AMD A
Intel Atom
|
| CPU group |
AMD A12-9800
Intel Atom C3000
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
7
2
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD A12-9800 vs Intel Atom C3858 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
3.80 GHz
2.00 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3858 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
AMD Radeon R7 - 512 (Bristol Ridge)
no iGPU
|
| GPU frequency |
1.11 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
8
|
| Shader |
512
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
2 GB
--
|
| Max. displays |
2
|
| Generation |
6
|
| Technology |
28 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2016
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3858. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
Decode
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
Decode
No
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
No
|
| JPEG |
Decode / Encode
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3858 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
64 GB
256 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
2
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A12-9800 or Intel Atom C3858? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
65 W
25 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
90 \xc2\xb0C
100 °C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A12-9800 and Intel Atom C3858 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
AM4 (LGA 1331)
BGA 1310
|
| L2-Cache |
2.00 MB
12.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Excavator (Bristol Ridge)
Denverton
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
|
| Release date |
Q3/2017
Q3/2017
|
| Part Number |
AD9800AUABBOX
--
|
