Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD A10-9700
-
Higher clock speed3.50 GHz
2.20 GHz
Around -59% better clock speed -
Performance per watt65 W
85 W
About 1.31 0.97 times less performance per watt
Top features of Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD A10-9700 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD A10-9700
Intel Xeon Silver 4114T
|
| Family |
AMD A
Intel Xeon Silver
|
| CPU group |
AMD A10-9700
Intel Xeon Silver 4100
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Desktop / Server
|
| Generation |
7
1
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD A10-9700 vs Intel Xeon Silver 4114T by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Core architecture |
normal
normal
|
| Overclocking |
No
No
|
| Frequency |
3.50 GHz
2.20 GHz
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A10-9700 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
AMD Radeon R7 - 384 (Bristol Ridge)
no iGPU
|
| GPU frequency |
1.03 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
No turbo
|
| Execution units |
6
|
| Shader |
384
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
2 GB
--
|
| Max. displays |
2
|
| Generation |
6
|
| Technology |
28 nm
|
| Release date |
Q3/2017
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A10-9700 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
No
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
No
|
| h264 |
Decode
No
|
| VP8 |
No
No
|
| VP9 |
No
No
|
| AV1 |
No
No
|
| AVC |
Decode
No
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
No
|
| JPEG |
Decode / Encode
No
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD A10-9700 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR4-2400
DDR4-2400
|
| Max. Memory |
64 GB
|
| Memory channels |
2 (Dual Channel)
6
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A10-9700 or Intel Xeon Silver 4114T? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
65 W
85 W
|
| TDP down |
45 W
--
|
| Tjunction max. |
90 \xc2\xb0C
--
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A10-9700 and Intel Xeon Silver 4114T CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Technology |
28 nm
14 nm
|
| Socket |
AM4 (LGA 1331)
LGA 3647
|
| L2-Cache |
2.00 MB
--
|
| L3-Cache |
--
14.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Excavator (Bristol Ridge)
Skylake SP
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, FMA3, FMA4
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
|
| Release date |
Q3/2017
Q3/2017
|
