Intel Core i9-9820X VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Comparing Intel Core i9-9820X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Comparison of video cards Intel Core i9-9820X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 in benchmarks and specifications.

Differences Specifications

Differences

Top features of Intel Core i9-9820X

Report a bug

Higher clock speed

3.30 GHz 1.80 GHz

Around -83% better clock speed
More number of cores

10 8

2 times more threads
Higher turbo clock speed

4.20 GHz 1.80 GHz

Around 57% better overclocked clock speed

Top features of Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

Report a bug

Specifications

Complete list of technical specifications

Intel Core i9-9820X Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

CPU generation and family

Let's find out which one of Intel Core i9-9820X and Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.

Specification	Value
Name	Intel Core i9-9820X Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
Segment	Desktop / Server Mobile
Family	Intel Core i9 Qualcomm Snapdragon
Generation	9 6
CPU group	Intel Core i 9000X Qualcomm Snapdragon 632

CPU Cores and Base Frequency

In this block we are going to compare Intel Core i9-9820X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.

Specification	Value
Frequency	3.30 GHz 1.80 GHz
CPU Cores	10 8
Turbo (1 Core)	4.20 GHz 1.80 GHz
CPU Threads	20 8
Hyperthreading	Yes No
Overclocking	Yes No
Core architecture	normal hybrid (big.LITTLE)
A core	-- 4x Kryo 250 Gold
B core	-- 4x Kryo 250 Silver

Internal Graphics

Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in Intel Core i9-9820X and Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.

Specification	Value
GPU name	no iGPU Qualcomm Adreno 506
GPU frequency	0.60 GHz
GPU (Turbo)	No turbo 0.60 GHz
Shader	96
Generation	5
DirectX Version	11
Technology	14 nm
Release date	Q4/2015

Hardware codec support

Let's compare the support of video codecs between Intel Core i9-9820X and Qualcomm Snapdragon 632. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.

Specification	Value
h265 / HEVC (8 bit)	No Decode
h265 / HEVC (10 bit)	No No
h264	No Decode / Encode
VP9	No No
VP8	No No
AV1	No No
AVC	No No
VC-1	No Decode
JPEG	No Decode / Encode

Memory & PCIe

To choose the best model between Intel Core i9-9820X and Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.

Specification	Value
Memory type	DDR4-2666 LPDDR3
Max. Memory	128 GB
ECC	No No
Memory channels	4 2
PCIe version	3.0
PCIe lanes	44

Encryption

AES-NI encryption support for CPUs Intel Core i9-9820X and Qualcomm Snapdragon 632.

Specification	Value
AES-NI	Yes No

Thermal Management

Let's find out what TDP value would be better for Intel Core i9-9820X or Qualcomm Snapdragon 632? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.

Specification	Value
TDP (PL1)	165 W
Tjunction max.	95 °C --

Technical details

Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for Intel Core i9-9820X and Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.

Specification	Value
Instruction set (ISA)	x86-64 (64 bit) ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d None
ISA extensions	SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
L3-Cache	17.00 MB --
Architecture	Skylake X Refresh Kryo 250
Technology	14 nm 14 nm
Socket	LGA 2066 N/A
Release date	Q4/2018 Q3/2018
Part Number	-- SDM632