Русский 
Deutsch 
Português 
Italiano 
Français 
日本語 
Español 
Polski 
简体中文 
한국어 
Differences
Top features of AMD A10-6800K
Top features of Intel Core i7-13800H
-
Performance per watt45 W
100 W
About 0.45 times less performance per watt
Specifications
Complete list of technical specificationsCPU generation and family
Let's find out which one of AMD A10-6800K and Intel Core i7-13800H is of a more recent generation, and what segment it belongs to.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Name |
AMD A10-6800K
Intel Core i7-13800H
|
| Segment |
Desktop / Server
Mobile
|
| Family |
AMD A
Intel Core i7
|
| Generation |
3
13
|
| CPU group |
AMD A10-6000
Intel Core i 13000H
|
| Predecessor |
--
Intel Core i7-12800H
|
CPU Cores and Base Frequency
In this block we are going to compare AMD A10-6800K vs Intel Core i7-13800H by main technical specifications: number of cores and threads, base and maximum frequencies, process technology and cache size. The higher these specifications are, the more powerful your CPU will be.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Overclocking |
Yes
No
|
| Core architecture |
normal
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
|
Internal Graphics
Common specifications for integrated graphics cards in AMD A10-6800K and Intel Core i7-13800H along with supported interfaces and connection options. This block has no effect on the final efficiency of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| GPU name |
AMD Radeon HD 8670D
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 96 (Alder Lake)
|
| GPU frequency |
0.84 GHz
0.40 GHz
|
| GPU (Turbo) |
No turbo
1.50 GHz
|
| Execution units |
6
96
|
| Shader |
384
768
|
| Max. GPU Memory |
2 GB
32 GB
|
| Max. displays |
2
4
|
| Generation |
5
13
|
| Technology |
32 nm
10 nm
|
| Release date |
Q2/2013
Q1/2022
|
Hardware codec support
Let's compare the support of video codecs between AMD A10-6800K and Intel Core i7-13800H. Hardware support of video decoding by embedded graphics cards directly affects the speed and quality of rendering videos.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| h265 / HEVC (8 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h265 / HEVC (10 bit) |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| h264 |
Decode
Decode / Encode
|
| VP9 |
No
Decode / Encode
|
| VP8 |
No
Decode
|
| AV1 |
No
Decode
|
| AVC |
Decode
Decode / Encode
|
| VC-1 |
Decode
Decode
|
| JPEG |
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
|
Memory & PCIe
To choose the best model between AMD A10-6800K and Intel Core i7-13800H you need to pay special attention to memory type, clock frequency, multi-channel features, and PCIe version. The higher these numbers are, the better your CPU will be. Keep in mind that the maximum memory and frequency may also depend on the model of the motherboard.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Memory type |
DDR3-2133
DDR4-3200, DDR5-5200, LPDDR4X-4266, LPDDR5-6400
|
| Max. Memory |
64 GB
|
| ECC |
No
Yes
|
| Memory channels |
2
2 (Dual Channel)
|
Thermal Management
Let's find out what TDP value would be better for AMD A10-6800K or Intel Core i7-13800H? The Thermal Design Power (TDP) indicates the maximum amount of heat that should be dissipated by the chip cooling system. However, the value of TDP gives only a rough indication of the real power consumption of the CPU.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| TDP (PL1) |
100 W
45 W
|
| TDP (PL2) |
--
115 W
|
| TDP down |
--
35 W
|
| Tjunction max. |
--
100 \xc2\xb0C
|
Technical details
Here you can find a comparison of 2nd and 3rd level cache sizes for AMD A10-6800K and Intel Core i7-13800H CPUs along with a list of ISA extensions.
| Specification | Value |
|---|---|
| Instruction set (ISA) |
x86-64 (64 bit)
x86-64 (64 bit)
|
| Virtualization |
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
|
| ISA extensions |
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
|
| L3-Cache |
4.00 MB
24.00 MB
|
| Architecture |
Richland (Piledriver)
Raptor Lake H
|
| Technology |
32 nm
10 nm
|
| Socket |
FM2
BGA 1744
|
| Release date |
Q2/2013
Q1/2023
|
